Updates are available Erratum dated 2020-04-21
Click to view Erratum: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00166-z
-
Authors
Ufer, Stefan
Bochnik, Katrin
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 20 January 2019
Accepted: 28 January 2020
First Online: 11 February 2020
Change Date: 21 April 2020
Change Type: Erratum
Change Details: Because of an error during typesetting, wrong significance indicators were used in Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the initially published version of the manuscript. There, the symbols “*: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.10, **: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.05, ***: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.01, ****: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.001” were used, while the symbols “<Superscript>t</Superscript>: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.10, *: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.05, **: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.01, ***: <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis> < 0.001” would have been correct.
