Crossmark

Making the BEST Decision—the BESTa Project: Description of the Design and Alpha Phases as Part of the Development of a Digital Decision Aid for Cancer Screening in Sweden

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02633-y

Published Online: 2025-04-26

Published Print: 2026-03

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Fritzell, Kaisa

Wangmar, Johanna

Hedberg, Berith

Woudstra, Anke

Forsberg, Anna

Kottorp, Anders

Franklin, Karl A.

Jervaeus, Anna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-8142
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Cancerfonden (FE Prevention)

Cancerfonden (22 0598 FE 01 H)

Regional Cancer Centres (Dnr VKN 2020-0212)

Karolinska Institute
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-04-26

Version of Record valid from 2025-04-26
More Information

Article History

Accepted: 14 April 2025

First Online: 26 April 2025

Declarations

:

: The risk of violation of integrity was considered small as data were analysed and presented on group level. Individuals gave their consent prior to inclusion; for the design phase, 17 signed a consent form and 1 gave oral consent due to visual impairment. The oral consent was given to both researchers (AJ and KF) before the interview started and was documented in the pre-organised Excel sheet. For the alpha phase, 11 signed a consent form prior to the interview. This project has followed the Swedish statue Ethical Review Act and has been reviewed, before the study started, by The Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Sweden has an ethical authority since 2019) Dnr 2022–00786 - 01. They had no ethical objections.

: Yes, given by all authors.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below