Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Klempel, Natalie J. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7937-6470
Kennedy, Niamh https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-0828
Pedlow, Katy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9032
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Scientific Research Committee (SRC) and NICHS Board (2020_S01)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Accepted: 21 July 2023
First Online: 13 October 2023
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
: The protocol for this paper can be viewed on Prospero ID CRD42021293107.
: All tables and figures are our own. Figure was adapted and cited from Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, and PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLos Med. 2009; 6(7), 1–6. . Table is adapted and cited from Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. <i>Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health</i>. 1998; 52:377–84. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377. Table is adapted and cited from Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018). CASP (Systematic Review) Checklist. [online] Available from: . [Accessed 04/04/2022].
