Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-03-02
First Online: 2 March 2018
Compliance with Ethical Standards
: The study protocol was submitted to (a member of) an ethics committee in The UK, The Netherlands and Germany. In The UK, approval was obtained from the UCL Research Ethics Committee (Project ID number 6855/001). In The Netherlands, the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc UMCG) determined that ethical approval was not needed for this study (reference number M16.191043). In Germany, a review by an ethics committee was not necessary. Therefore, no further approval was deemed necessary for the other countries. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
: The Web-RADR project has received support from the Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking (ExternalRef removed) under Grant Agreement n◦ 115632, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution, ExternalRef removed, UK.
: Sieta T. de Vries, Petra Denig, Carmen Lasheras Ruiz, François Houÿez, Lisa Wong, and Alastair Sutcliffe have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study. Peter G. M. Mol is an employee of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board.