Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
University of Iowa (University of Iowa)
Eastern Illinois University (Eastern Illinois University)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Accepted: 15 April 2025
First Online: 28 April 2025
Declarations
:
: There are ethical and efficacy implications in considering high school students’ preferences for praise and reprimand. When delivering praise, teachers should match students with their preferred method of praise and reprimand. If preferences are unknown, or when praise is delivered universally (Tier 1) it appears safe to deliver praise privately to high school students.
: We have no known conflicts of interest to disclose.
