Crossmark

Results from two decades of five-yearly plagiarism surveys: new insights into prevalence, understanding, attitudes, knowing vs naïve plagiarism, and generative artificial intelligence (genAI)

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-026-00215-z

Published Online: 2026-03-27

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Curtis, Guy J.

Arness, David C.

Baird, Michael

Price, Chloe

Thomson, Sheona

Tremayne, Kell

White, Amanda W.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Author's discretionary consultancy funds
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-03-27

Version of Record valid from 2026-03-27
More Information

Article History

Received: 2 October 2025

Accepted: 9 March 2026

First Online: 27 March 2026

Declarations

:

: Ethical approval was received from University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (HERC 2024/ET000175), and reciprocal ethics approval was obtained at the other universities where data were collected.

: The authors consent to publish this manuscript.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below