Updates are available Correction dated 2019-11-09
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-019-00138-6
-
Authors
Yakubova, Gulnoza http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4223-3545
Leibowitz, Louis
Baer, Briella L.
Halawani, Nada
Lestremau, Lauren
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
First Online: 23 January 2019
Change Date: 9 November 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Date: 9 November 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A correction should be made to the procedural reliability and interobserver agreement (IOA) sub-section within the Method section of the paper. In the Method section of the paper, the procedures for reliability and IOA were stated, however, the results were not. The following were the results: Procedural reliability per student for each phase, i.e., baseline, intervention, and follow-up, was 100%. Similarly, IOA for each student per phase was 100%.
Change Details: A correction should be made to the procedural reliability and interobserver agreement (IOA) sub-section within the Method section of the paper. In the Method section of the paper, the procedures for reliability and IOA were stated, however, the results were not. The following were the results: Procedural reliability per student for each phase, i.e., baseline, intervention, and follow-up, was 100%. Similarly, IOA for each student per phase was 100%.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of the University of Maryland, College Park, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
