Crossmark

Reply to “Fundamental Flaws in the Design and Reporting of Chew and Neo (2024)”

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-025-00487-3

Published Online: 2025-07-29

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Chew, Peter K. H. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-1481
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

James Cook University
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-07-29

Version of Record valid from 2025-07-29
More Information

Article History

Accepted: 15 July 2025

First Online: 29 July 2025

Declarations

:

: N.A.

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.