Crossmark

A Comparative Study of the Improved Negative-Pressure Drainage Tube and the Penrose Silicone Drainage Tube: Which Is More Beneficial for Wounds from Deep Infections Healing? A Rabbit Model Study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01601-4

Published Online: 2025-10-27

Published Print: 2026-01

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Jia, Jingwen

Wei, Ziyan

Chen, Yanan

Chen, Shuwei

Ma, Yingping

Kang, Xuewen
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-10-27

Version of Record valid from 2025-10-27
More Information

Article History

Received: 26 August 2025

Accepted: 12 October 2025

First Online: 27 October 2025

Declarations

:

: The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

: Not applicable.

: This study was approved by the local ethics committee (the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Approval No.: D2023-210). The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

: Our research is an animal study and therefore does not require the signing of patient informed consent.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below