Crossmark

“How many rounds is enough?” A duoethnographic study of emotion, repositioning, and agency in academic peer review

Published Online: 2026-09-01

Authors

Cong-Lem, Ngo https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3299-477X
Khanh-Quynh, Tran https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-6955
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Monash University
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-09-01

Version of Record valid from 2026-09-01
More Information

Article History

Received: 19 July 2025

Accepted: 19 August 2026

First Online: 1 September 2026

Declarations

Ethical approval: This duoethnographic study was conducted collaboratively by the co-authors, who served as both researchers and participants, with mutual consent, ongoing dialogue, and ethical responsibility guiding all stages of data generation, analysis, and representation.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process: During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, to support language refinement, improve clarity and readability, and assist with the organisation of selected sections. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Document is current