Document is current

Article History

Received: 19 November 2025

Accepted: 14 May 2026

First Online: 4 June 2026

Declarations

:

: Not applicable.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

: The authors state that generative artificial intelligence was not initially used in the preparation of the manuscript. Subsequently, ChatGPT and the Gemini 1.5 Pro model (Google DeepMind) were used solely to check the language for grammatical errors in the changes proposed during the first review, following the instruction: “Good morning, I am writing an article; this is the draft. I would appreciate it if you could correct any grammatical errors. I want to change as few words as possible and only want changes made if there are grammatical errors. I do not want to lose content nor include additional content”.The use of AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, in this manuscript was strictly limited to correcting grammatical errors and assisting with the English translation of the text. During the final review phase, the Gemini 1.5 Pro model (Google DeepMind) was used to facilitate the structural integration of the content modifications requested by the reviewers. The AI tools were used to integrate and synthesize manually entered evidence, with explicit instructions that no information should be lost or added and that author citations should neither be included nor removed in the five modified subsections [4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5], ensuring thematic continuity and logical transitions between the original manuscript and the updated technical requirements.During the final revision phase, the Gemini 1.5 Pro model (Google DeepMind) was used exclusively to assist in the structural integration of content requested by the reviewers and was never used to generate scientific content. All changes made with the assistance of AI were carefully verified and validated manually by the authors. After this process, the text was paraphrased manually and the content was verified for accuracy. The English translation was subsequently reviewed using ChatGPT and/or Gemini. The authors emphasize that AI tools were never used to generate original scientific content, data, or interpretations. Every modification, citation, and reference suggested or facilitated by AI was manually cross-checked and validated by the authors. The manuscript underwent a final manual paraphrasing to ensure accuracy. Although AI detectors may flag certain segments due to the linguistic refinement process, the authors certify that the intellectual core and scientific findings are entirely their own.