Crossmark

Ethical limits and suggestions for improving the use of AI in scientific research, academic publishing, and the peer review process, based on deontological and consequentialist viewpoints

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00696-z

Published Online: 2025-07-16

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Daoudi, Mohammed
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-07-16

Version of Record valid from 2025-07-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 11 April 2025

Accepted: 9 July 2025

First Online: 16 July 2025

Declarations

:

: This study did not require ethical approval, as it involved the use of anonymous survey data collected from consenting adult participants. According to the guidelines of Mohammed V University and relevant national research regulations in Morocco, ethics approval was deemed unnecessary. The study adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and institutional policies governing research with human participants. All participants provided informed consent before participating in the survey.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below