Crossmark

Venous excess ultrasound score-guided fluid resuscitation versus conventional fluid resuscitation in sepsis and septic shock patients—a case control study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44349-025-00029-x

Published Online: 2025-10-03

Published Print: 2025-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Fattah, Marwa ElSayed Abdel

AbdelAziz, Kamel

AlAnsary, Mohamed Gamal

AlSaeed, Marianne Mamdouh

Tawfeek, Samir El Hadidy
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-10-03

Version of Record valid from 2025-10-03
More Information

Article History

Received: 8 March 2025

Accepted: 9 July 2025

First Online: 3 October 2025

Declarations

:

: The Local Research Ethics Committee (REC) for experimental and clinical studies at the Critical Care Department of the Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, approved this research protocol (MD-204-2022). All patients were informed about the technique, and we obtained informed consent from all participants. It complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

: Informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants included in the study.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below