Updates are available Correction dated 2020-10-19
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61841-4_19
-
Authors
Nygren, Thomas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-3252
Wiksten Folkeryd, Jenny http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9878-199X
Liberg, Caroline http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9194-9294
Guath, Mona http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9613-0808
- License Information
-
More Information
Chapter History
First Online: 19 October 2020
Change Date: 19 October 2020
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the original online version of the chapter 5 was previously published non-open access. It was changed to open access retrospectively under a CC BY 4.0 license and, the presentation of Table 3 was different to that of Tables 2 and 4. This has been corrected. In addition, Tables 5 - 8 have been moved from the main text to Appendix B, at the request of the authors.
Change Details: The original version of the chapter 11 contained an error in Table 2, which also affected Section 3.1 and the Conclusion. The original figure in Table 2 indicated that one community was retweeting from a smaller number of accounts than the other communities. A recalculation following publication showed that the community was retweeting from a pool of about the same number of accounts as the other communities. This has been updated.
Conference Information
Conference Acronym: MISDOOM
Conference Name: Multidisciplinary International Symposium on Disinformation in Open Online Media
Conference City: Leiden
Conference Country: The Netherlands
Conference Year: 2020
Conference Start Date: 26 October 2020
Conference End Date: 27 October 2020
Conference Number: 2
Conference ID: misdoom2020
Conference URL: https://2020.misdoom.org/
Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)
Type: Single-blind
Conference Management System: Easychair
Number of Submissions Sent for Review: 23
Number of Full Papers Accepted: 18
Number of Short Papers Accepted: 0
Acceptance Rate of Full Papers: 78% - The value is computed by the equation "Number of Full Papers Accepted / Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100" and then rounded to a whole number.
Average Number of Reviews per Paper: 2.2
Average Number of Papers per Reviewer: 2
External Reviewers Involved: Yes
Additional Info on Review Process: The conference was held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
