Ogier, Jacqueline M. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-4009
Gao, Yujing http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-7062
Dunne, Eileen M. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5542-0780
Wilson, Michael A. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7750-2717
Ranganathan, Sarath C. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-0307
Tesch, Gregory H. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-3092
Nikolic Paterson, David J. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5734-2931
Dabdoub, Alain http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4259-2425
Burt, Rachel A. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-8266
Nayagam, Bryony A. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-6059
Lockhart, Paul J. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2531-8413
Funding for this research was provided by:
Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation
University of Melbourne
Article History
Received: 9 June 2021
Revised: 7 February 2022
Accepted: 3 March 2022
First Online: 26 April 2022
Change Date: 10 May 2022
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-022-02203-5
Declarations
:
: The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute Animal Ethics Committee approved mouse procedures in project numbers A875 and A904, in compliance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, 2013. The Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI) Animal Care Committee approved mouse procedures in protocol number 21515, conforming with Canadian Council on Animal Care requirements. The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) Human Research Ethics Committee approved the collection of sputum specimens in project number 25054. Clinical specimens were collected in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council’s Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, 2007 (2018 Update) and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2018. Written approval for collection, research, and publication using participant sputum samples was given by the parents of participants (signed informed consent forms).
: The authors declare no competing interests.