Updates are available Correction dated 2021-02-16

Article History

Received: 12 August 2020

Accepted: 27 October 2020

First Online: 23 November 2020

Change Date: 16 February 2021

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:

Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01713-y

Compliance with Ethical Standards

:

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

: The study was conducted in compliance with the current laws of the Spanish Government. Bird ringing was done by RJ under the Spanish Ministry ringing license number 300111. All applicable national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.No endangered species were involved in this study. All birds were studied with mild severity methods and released at sampling locality some minutes after capture. Birds were captured and feathers were collected under a permit granted by Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Desarrollo Rural de la Junta de Andalucía, and permit from the Parque Natural Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche. The sampling protocol was approved by the Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural de la Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio and the Subcomité de Bioética (CSIC). The study from which feather masses were obtained [CitationRef removed] had permits that were granted by the Spanish regional administration Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Caza y Patrimonio, Cabildo de Lanzarote (permit ES-000687/2015), and Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat, Generalitat de Catalunya (permit SF/0229/2019).

: Not applicable.

: Not applicable.

: The code generated during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.