Updates are available Correction dated 2019-04-22
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01161-y
-
Authors
Winter, Patricia L. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7963-9365
Padgett, Pamela E.
Milburn, Lee-Anne S.
Li, Weimin
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station (RJVA 13-JV-11272131-051)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 15 November 2017
Accepted: 22 January 2019
First Online: 8 February 2019
Change Date: 22 April 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The original version of the article contained an error in the Exposure to Ozone section, paragraph 4, the 1st sentence, reporting the finding that male recreationists experienced higher ozone dose exposure than female recreationists, the number should be males M = 77.08.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional Review Board approval was granted through California State Polytechnic University, Pomona File Review # 14-0111.
