Updates are available Correction dated 2020-02-17

Article History

Received: 29 July 2019

Revised: 18 October 2019

Accepted: 12 November 2019

First Online: 3 January 2020

Change Date: 17 February 2020

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: The original version of this article, published on 03 January 2020, unfortunately contained two mistakes.

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Dr. Zhaoxiang Ye.

: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

: One of the authors (Yuwei Zhang) has significant statistical expertise.

: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study.

: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (E2012036).

: This study included the population of a clinical trial (NCT01792999) of which subgroup analyses had been published previously regarding diagnostic performance analysis, visual and quantitative breast density assessment, breast tissue coverage and comfort comparison, and tumor size evaluation. In comparison, here we investigated molecular subtype prediction that had not been evaluated previously.① Li H, Yin L, Ye Z, et al (2015) Comparative study of breast tissue coverage in cone-beam breast CT versus digital mammography. Chin J Radiol 49:488–490 in Chinese② Liu A, Ma Y, Yin L, Han P, Li H, Ye Z (2018) Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast. Chin J Oncol 40:604–609 in Chinese③ Liu A, Ma Y, Yin L, Han P, Li H, Ye Z (2018) Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT in dense breast lesions. China Oncology 28:807–812 in Chinese④ Liu A, Ye Z, Ma Y, Cao Y (2018) Reliability of breast density estimation based on cone beam breast CT. Chin J Clin Oncol 45:246–250 in Chinese⑤ Ma Y, Ye Z, Liu A, Yin L, Han P, Li H (2019) The accuracy of tumor size evaluation on invasive breast cancer based on cone beam breast CT. Chin J Radiol 53:286–291 in Chinese⑥ Ma Y, Cao Y, Liu A, et al (2019) A reliability comparison of cone-beam breast computed tomography and mammography: breast density assessment referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas. Acad Radiol 26:752–759⑦ Li H, Yin L, He N, et al (2019) Comparison of comfort between cone beam breast computed tomography and digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 120:108674

: • retrospective• diagnostic or prognostic study• performed at one institution