Updates are available Correction dated 2021-12-14
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02778-8
-
Authors
Reinders, Ilse http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-4254
Visser, Marjolein
Jyväkorpi, Satu K.
Niskanen, Riikka T.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Jornada Ben, Ângela
Brouwer, Ingeborg A.
Kuijper, Lothar D.
Olthof, Margreet R.
Pitkälä, Kaisu H.
Vijlbrief, Rachel
Suominen, Merja H.
Wijnhoven, Hanneke A. H.
-
Clinical Trials BETA
Clinical trials referenced in this document:
nct03712306 at ClinicalTrials.govDocuments that mention this clinical trial
The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02675-0
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of personalised dietary advice aiming at increasing protein intake on physical functioning in community-dwelling older adults with lower habitual protein intake: rationale and design of the PROMISS randomised controlled trial (Pre-results)
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040637
Effect of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake on food consumption and the environmental impact of the diet in community-dwelling older adults: results from the PROMISS trial
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02896-x
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (678732)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 21 June 2021
Accepted: 2 September 2021
First Online: 5 October 2021
Change Date: 14 December 2021
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02778-8
Declarations
:
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland (ethical approval number HUS/1530/2018) and The Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (ethical approval number 2018.399).
: Oral informed consent was obtained from participants before the screening procedure and written informed consent was obtained at the start of the first clinic visit.
: Not applicable. Personal data were not identifiable during the analysis.
