Hayes, S. C.
Steele, M. L.
Spence, R. R.
Gordon, L.
Battistutta, D.
Bashford, J.
Pyke, C.
Saunders, C.
Eakin, E.
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Breast Cancer Foundation
Article History
Received: 11 October 2017
Accepted: 14 October 2017
First Online: 23 October 2017
Change Date: 10 November 2017
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the original publication of the article, under the heading Discussion, 1st paragraph, the sentence that reads as, “Nonetheless, our observed improvements of over 50% for OS and over 30% for DFS (HRs: 0.45 and 0.66, respectively) are consistent with results from other available studies” should read as “Nonetheless, our observed improvements of over 50% for OS and DFS (HRs: 0.45 and 0.66, respectively) are consistent with results from other available studies.” Under the heading Discussion, 3rd paragraph, the sentence that reads as “We cannot discount the possibility …such as education, income and access to care [1, 7]” should read as “We cannot discount the possibility…such as education, income and access to care, which ultimately have on survival outcomes [1, 7].”
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.