Updates are available Correction dated 2023-05-09
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-023-01419-9
-
Authors
Avigliano, Esteban http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-2291
Pisonero, Jorge
Bouchez, Julien
Pouilly, Marc
Domanico, Alejandro
Sánchez, Sebastian
Clavijo, Cristhian
Scarabotti, Pablo
Facetti, Juan F.
Caffetti, Jacqueline D.
del Rosso, Franco R.
Llamazares Vegh, Sabina
Volpedo, Alejandra V.
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (PIP112-20120100543CO)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT 20020150100052BA)
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (PICT 2015-1823)
Entidad Binacional Yacyretá (2010-2014)
Government of the Principality of Asturias (FC-15-GRUPIN14-040)
IPGP multidisciplinary program PARI and by the Region Île-de-France SESAME (grant12015908)
Administrative Commission of the River Uruguay (2011-2014)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 4 September 2020
Accepted: 14 February 2021
First Online: 23 March 2021
Change Date: 20 April 2023
Change Type: Update
Change Details: Supplementary 2-4 were missing from this article and have now been uploaded.
Change Date: 9 May 2023
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-023-01419-9
Declarations
: The authors declare not to have any interest conflicts. <i>Prochilodus lineatus</i> is not protected under wildlife conservation laws (local legislations, IUCN, or CITES). As the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Técnicas (CONICET) does not possess a formal animal research ethics committee regarding the fish welfare and sampling protocols, fish handling during sampling was performed following guidelines of the ethical committee of the UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals (ExternalRef removed). Collection fish was authorized by the local Wildlife and Fisheries Authority guidelines and policies (Ministerio de Ecología y Recursos Renovables of Misiones Province, Law XVI N° 47, N° 509/07 and 052/18, Dirección de Recursos Naturales of Corrientes Province, Law 1863/54, and Comisión Administradora del Río Uruguay, RS27/04). The fish in this study were not a part of faunal surveys and they did not employ any type of experimental procedure, surgery or chemical agents that would induce injury on the collected organisms.
: <i>Prochilodus lineatus</i> is not protected under wildlife conservation laws (local legislations, IUCN, or CITES). As the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Técnicas (CONICET) does not possess a formal animal research ethics committee regarding the fish welfare and sampling protocols, fish handling during sampling was performed following guidelines of the ethical committee of the UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals (ExternalRef removed). Collection fish was authorized by the local Wildlife and Fisheries Authority guidelines and policies (Ministerio de Ecología y Recursos Renovables of Misiones Province, Law XVI N° 47, N° 509/07 and 052/18, Dirección de Recursos Naturales of Corrientes Province, Law 1863/54, and Comisión Administradora del Río Uruguay, RS27/04). The fish in this study were not a part of faunal surveys and they did not employ any type of experimental procedure, surgery or chemical agents that would induce injury on the collected organisms.
: Not applicable.
: Not applicable.
: There are no conflicts of interest.
