Updates are available Correction dated 2017-10-14

Article History

First Online: 12 September 2015

Change Date: 14 October 2017

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: The original version of the article unfortunately contained mistake in the “Methods/Participants” section (p. 224) as “[M TD = 168.26 (SD = 125.18) vs. M AU = 172.91 (SD = 195.88) vs. M DS = 145.43 (SD = 88.78); Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2(2) = 2.42, p = .30], and for word types [M TD = 28.43 (SD = 26.89) vs. M AU = 39.65 (SD = 49.07) vs. M DS = 18.35 (SD = 22.78); χ 2(2) = 3.15, p = .21]’’. The correct text is given below: “[M TD = 51.91 (SD = 59.68) vs. M AU = 74.43 (SD = 116.01) vs. M DS = 25.26 (SD = 39.39); Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2(2) = 3.39, p = .18], and for word types [M TD = 18.48 (SD = 20.51) vs. M AU = 24.74 (SD = 32.98) vs. M DS  = 11.22 (SD = 18.87); χ 2(2) = 3.58, p = .17]”..

Compliance with Ethical Standards

:

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

: This study was approved by an ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards specified in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All parents provided informed consent for their and their child’s participation prior to their inclusion in the study.