Zhao, Zhanqi http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-2207
Lee, Li-Chung
Chang, Mei-Yun
Frerichs, Inez
Chang, Hou-Tai
Gow, Chien-Hung
Hsu, Yeong-Long
Möller, Knut
Clinical trials referenced in this document:
Documents that mention this clinical trial
The incidence and interpretation of large differences in EIT-based measures for PEEP titration in ARDS patients
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00396-8
Positive end-expiratory pressure titration with electrical impedance tomography and pressure–volume curve in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0484-0
Funding for this research was provided by:
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (FEMH-2016-C-012, FEMH-2017-C-055)
Article History
Received: 14 May 2019
Accepted: 26 September 2019
First Online: 5 October 2019
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: Zhanqi Zhao receives a consulting fee from Dräger Medical. Inéz Frerichs reports funding by the European Union’s 7th Framework Program for Research and Technological Development (WELCOME, Grant No. 611223), the European Union’s Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon2020 (CRADL, Grant No. 668259 and WELMO, Grant No. 825572) and reimbursement of speaking fees, congress and travel costs by Dräger Medical. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.
: The study was approved by the FEMH Ethics Committee in Taiwan (FEMH-105117-E). The present study involves data from our ongoing registry for EIT guiding PEEP titration (clinical trial registration number NCT03112512, ExternalRef removed, registered 13 April 2017).
: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal representatives prior to the study.
Free to read: This content has been made available to all.