When better is the enemy of good: two cautionary tales of conceptual validity versus parsimony in clinical psychometric research
Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03617-z
Published Online: 2024-03-08
Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy
Schwartz, Carolyn E. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-7774
Borowiec, Katrina
Rapkin, Bruce D.
Text and Data Mining valid from 2024-03-08
Version of Record valid from 2024-03-08
Article History
Accepted: 24 January 2024
First Online: 8 March 2024
Declarations
:
: All authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest and report no disclosures.
: Not applicable.