Updates are available Erratum dated 2017-07-21
Click to view Erratum: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-017-1235-6
-
Authors
de la Barca, Juan Manuel Chao
Huang, Nuan-Ting
Jiao, Haihan
Tessier, Lydie
Gadras, Cédric
Simard, Gilles
Natoli, Riccardo
Tcherkez, Guillaume
Reynier, Pascal
Valter, Krisztina
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Fondation de France (Berthe Fouassier-2016)
Australian Research Council (FT140100645)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 29 August 2016
Accepted: 20 December 2016
First Online: 20 January 2017
Change Date: 21 July 2017
Change Type: Erratum
Change Details: An erratum to this article has been published.
Compliance with ethical standards
: All experiments conducted were in accordance with the ARVO Statement for Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research; the study was approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (AEEC) of the Australian National University (R.BSB.05.10).
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
: All procedures performed in the study involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee
