Updates are available Correction dated 2016-04-20
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/532308a
Updates are available Correction dated 2016-04-20
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/532308a
-
Authors
Robinson, Andrew
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
First Online: 20 October 2015
Change Date: 7 April 2016
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The sentence about Bryan Wells’s estimate of the number of Indus script signs was revised to more accurately reflect Wells’s contributions. He estimated the number of signs at 676, not 958.
Change Date: 20 April 2016
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the Comment 'Cracking the Indus script' (A. Robinson Nature 526, 499–501; 2015 ), the sentence about Bryan Wells's estimate of the number of Indus script signs has been revised to more accurately reflect Wells's contributions. He estimated the number of signs at 676, not 958.
