Updates are available Erratum dated 2016-02-05

Article History

Received: 10 April 2014

Accepted: 22 May 2015

First Online: 22 June 2015

Change Date: 8 July 2015

Change Type: Erratum

Change Details: In the version of this article initially published online, several errors appeared in the HTML version. In the section “EISA recovers the role of transcription during neurogenesis,” the expression “(t1/2 = 1/α)” should have read “(t1/2 ~ 1/α)” in the sentence “mRNA half-life, on the other hand, is inversely proportional to the degradation rate (t1/2 = 1/α).” In the Online Methods, “Analysis of circadian dynamics data sets,” the symbol “<-” was given as “≤” in two cases and as “≤<” in one case; the formulas “coeffs ≤ lm(y ~ cbind(cos(w*t),-sin(w*t)))$coefficients”; “C ≤< sqrt(coeffs[2]^2 + coeffs[3]^2)”; “ϕ ≤ atan2(coeffs[3],coeffs[2])” should have been “coeffs <- lm(y ~ cbind(cos(w*t),-sin(w*t)))$coefficients”; “C <- sqrt(coeffs[2]^2 + coeffs[3]^2)”; “ϕ <- atan2(coeffs[3],coeffs[2]).” In addition, the corresponding authors are Dimos Gaidatzis, Lukas Burger and Michael Stadler, rather than Dimos Gaidatzis, Lukas Burger and Maria Florescu. The errors have been corrected in HTML version of this article.

Competing interests

: The authors declare no competing financial interests.