Updates are available Erratum dated 2016-01-22
Click to view Erratum: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2016.2
-
Authors
Huynh, Karina
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
First Online: 26 November 2015
Change Date: 22 January 2016
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the version of the Research Highlight initially published online and in print, the text "29.3% had an adequate 6-month pacing capture threshold" should have read "98.3% had an adequate 6-month pacing capture threshold". The error has been corrected for the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
