Updates are available Correction dated 2025-07-18
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00792-0
-
Authors
Raza, Yasrab N.
Moustafa, Julia S. El-Sayed
Zhang, Xinyuan
Wang, Dongmeng
Tomlinson, Max
Falchi, Mario
Menni, Cristina
Bowyer, Ruth C. E.
Steves, Claire J.
Small, Kerrin S.
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 6 March 2024
Revised: 4 April 2025
Accepted: 8 April 2025
First Online: 24 April 2025
Change Date: 30 June 2025
Change Type: Update
Change Details: In the sentence beginning ‘We observe higher discordance amongst...’ in this article and in table 2, column ‘Variable’, the term ‘MZ’ should have read ‘DZ’ and vice versa.
Change Date: 18 July 2025
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00792-0
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: This study was carried out under TwinsUK BioBank ethics, approved by North West – Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 19/NW/0187), IRAS ID 258513. This approval supersedes earlier approvals granted to TwinsUK by the St Thomas’ Hospital Research Ethics Committee, later London – Westminster Research Ethics Committee (REC reference EC04/015), which have now been subsumed within the TwinsUK BioBank.
