Crossmark

Are micro enemas administered with a squeeze tube and a 5 cm-long nozzle as good or better than micro enemas administered with a 10 cm-long catheter attached to a syringe in people with a recent spinal cord injury? A non-inferiority, crossover randomised controlled trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00835-5

Published Online: 2022-07-27

Published Print: 2022-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Kelly, Louise C. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-3182
Glinsky, Joanne V.

Nier, Lianne M.

Garrett, Gillian

Harvey, Lisa A. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4365-0236
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

icare NSW Slater and Gordon
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2022-07-27

Version of Record valid from 2022-07-27
More Information

Article History

Received: 2 November 2021

Revised: 30 June 2022

Accepted: 1 July 2022

First Online: 27 July 2022

Competing interests

: The authors declare no competing interests.

: The trial was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. It was approved by the Lead Human Research Ethics Committee at Northern Sydney Local Health District (Reference HREC/17/HAWKE/146). We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below