Updates are available Correction dated 2025-03-03
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-025-01503-z
-
Authors
Wang, Lei
Tang, Xue-qing
Shi, Yang
Li, Hui-min
Meng, Zi-yu
Chen, Hui
Li, Xiao-han
Chen, Yong-chao
Liu, Heng
Hong, Yang
Xu, Heng-hui
Liu, Ling
Zhao, Limin
Han, Wei-na
Liu, Xin
Zhang, Yong
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 31 January 2022
Accepted: 7 July 2022
First Online: 10 August 2022
Change Date: 20 February 2025
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The original online version of this article was revised: The authors would like to apologize for the errors in the previously published images of Fig.2a. The HE staining in control group presented incorrect accidentally. The inaccuracy was due to an oversight during the preparation of the figures. The authors have carefully checked the raw data and corrected the accidentally confused image. The legend for Fig.1d contains an error regarding the number of mice. It should be changed into “E peak velocity was quantified. <i>n</i> = 7-9.” There is a minor error in the chemical formula of the third compound in Table 1. It should be changed into “<b>C</b><sub>20</sub><b>H</b><sub>21</sub><b>NO</b><sub>4</sub>”.
Change Date: 3 March 2025
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-025-01503-z
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Harbin Medical University [Protocol (2009)-11]. The use of animals was compliant with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996). All sacrifices were performed under anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize animal suffering.
