Ohata, Yae
Ali, Mohamad M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4902-0550
Tsubakihara, Yutaro
Itoh, Yuka
Rosén, Gabriela
Bergström, Tobias
Morén, Anita
Golán-Cancela, Irene
Nakada, Ayana
Voytyuk, Oleksandr
Tsuchiya, Maiko
Fukui, Rei
Yamamoto, Kouhei
Martín-Rubio, Paula https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-9212
Sancho, Patricia
Strell, Carina
Micke, Patrick
Wechsler-Reya, Robert J.
Hashizume, Yoshinobu
Miyazono, Kohei https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-0172
Caja, Laia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8786-8763
Heldin, Carl-Henrik https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-896X
Swartling, Fredrik J. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-4367
Moustakas, Aristidis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9131-3827
Article History
Received: 25 June 2024
Revised: 13 February 2025
Accepted: 19 March 2025
First Online: 28 March 2025
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: All the procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals as stated in The International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research involving Animals, developed by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). For the animal experiments in Sweden, mouse husbandry and manipulations followed the national guidelines after approval by the Uppsala University Animal Experiment Ethics Board (C105/16, 5.8.18-16350/2017 and 5.8.18-18303/2021). For the animal experiments in Spain, mice were housed according to institutional guidelines and all experimental procedures were performed in compliance with the guidelines for the welfare of experimental animals as approved by the Universidad of Zaragoza Ethics Committee (CEICA PI34/21).