Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
de Souza, Bruno Marchetti https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-3172
Rosa, João Ricardo Bachega Feijó https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9584-1691
Tambarussi, Evandro Vagner https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9478-5379
Wrege, Marcos Silveira https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-6586
Fritzsons, Elenice https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-426X
Resende, Lucileide Vilela https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1328-5709
Binneck, Eliseu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-0437
Diniz, Leandro Eugenio Cardamone https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-9945
Sebbenn, Alexandre Magno https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2352-0941
Grattapaglia, Dario https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0050-970X
de Sousa, Valderês Aparecida https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1138-8189
Freitas, Miguel Luiz Menezes https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-0908
de Aguiar, Ananda Virgínia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1225-7623
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 31 December 2024
Revised: 5 August 2025
Accepted: 7 August 2025
First Online: 10 October 2025
COMPETING INTERESTS
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: The research was conducted in accordance with all applicable institutional, national, and international guidelines for the use and conservation of plant genetic resources. Sampling was performed within a provenance and progeny test established under a legally authorized breeding program in Brazil. The test site and plant material are part of a public research initiative, and no endangered or protected wild populations were disturbed during the study. The study did not involve human participants or animals. Nevertheless, all activities were carried out in accordance with ethical principles for biodiversity research, including compliance with Brazil’s Law N° 13.123/2015 (Access to Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge) and the Nagoya Protocol.
