Updates are available Correction dated 2018-02-05

Article History

Received: 30 June 2017

Accepted: 9 October 2017

First Online: 8 December 2017

Change Date: 5 February 2018

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: In the original version of this Article, the second and third sentences of the first paragraph of the “Gate voltage and antidot period dependencies” section of the Results originally incorrectly read “The characteristic evolution of the sheet resistance ρ□=ρ□ (B=0) with Vg shown for three antidot samples and an unpatterned reference sample in Fig. 3a. The maxima of ρxx, located between Vg~0.5 and 1 V, reflect the charge neutrality point (CNP), corresponding to an EF position located slightly in the valence band (see band structure in Fig. 3b).” In the corrected version, “$${\mathrm{\rho }}_\square = {\mathrm{\rho }}_\square (B = 0)$$ρ□=ρ□(B=0)” is replaced by “$${\mathrm{\rho }}_\square = {\mathrm{\rho }}_{{\mathrm{xx}}}(B = 0)$$ρ□=ρxx(B=0)”, and “The maxima of $${\mathrm{\rho }}_{{\mathrm{xx}}}$$ρxx” is replaced by “The maxima of $${\mathrm{\rho }}_\square$$ρ□”.

Competing interests

: The authors declare no competing financial interests.