Waitz, M.
Bello, R. Y.
Metz, D.
Lower, J.
Trinter, F.
Schober, C.
Keiling, M.
Lenz, U.
Pitzer, M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-182X
Mertens, K.
Martins, M.
Viefhaus, J.
Klumpp, S.
Weber, T.
Schmidt, L. Ph. H.
Williams, J. B.
Schöffler, M. S.
Serov, V. V.
Kheifets, A. S.
Argenti, L.
Palacios, A.
Martín, F.
Jahnke, T.
Dörner, R. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-4268
Article History
Received: 17 July 2017
Accepted: 30 November 2017
First Online: 22 December 2017
Change Date: 5 June 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The original version of this Article contained an error in the fifth sentence of the first paragraph of the ‘Application on H<sub>2</sub>’ section of the Results, which incorrectly read ‘The role of electron correlation is quite apparent in this presentation: Fig. 1a is empty for the uncorrelated Hartree–Fock wave function, since projection of the latter wave function onto the 2<i>pσ</i><sub>u</sub> orbital is exactly zero, while this is not the case for the fully correlated wave function (Fig. 1d); also, Fig. 1b, c for the uncorrelated description are identical, while Fig. 1e, f for the correlated case are significantly different.’ The correct version replaces ‘Fig. 1e, f’ with ‘Fig. 2e and f’.
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing financial interests.