Crossmark

Reply to: Failure to apply standard limit-of-detection or limit-of-quantitation criteria to specialized pro-resolving mediator analysis incorrectly characterizes their presence in biological samples

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41767-9

Published Online: 2023-11-10

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Dalli, Jesmond https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-3640
Gomez, Esteban A.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2023-11-10

Version of Record valid from 2023-11-10
More Information

Article History

Received: 18 January 2022

Accepted: 18 September 2023

First Online: 10 November 2023

Competing interests

: J.D. is an inventor on patents related to the composition of matter and/or use of pro-resolving mediators some of which are licensed by Brigham and Women’s Hospital or Queen Mary University of London for clinical development. E.A.G. is an inventor on patents related to the use of pro-resolving mediators as diagnostics licensed by Queen Mary University of London for clinical development.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below