Chau, Long Fung https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1023-1177
Lillico, Simon
Opriessnig, Tanja
Blake, Rosemary
Tardy, Luc
Lee, Chen-Hsuin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-7604
Maxwell, Scott
Warren, Claire
Thornton, Elizabeth
Mclaughlin, Catherine L.
McLachlan, Gerry
Tait-Burkard, Christine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0471-3230
Fletcher, Sarah https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0075-098X
Anderson, Stephen
Brown, Sharon
Gibbard, Louise https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6886-8429
Tzelos, Thomas
MacMillan-Christensen, Dawn
Baillie, J. Kenneth https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-793X
Dorward, David A.
Griffiths, David J. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9160-0770
Grey, Finn https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4288-2059
Funding for this research was provided by:
RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/V018922/1, BBS/E/RL/230002A)
Wellcome Trust (IS3-R2.26 19/20)
Article History
Received: 3 April 2024
Accepted: 18 November 2024
First Online: 17 January 2025
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: Generation and maintenance of transgenic pigs was approved by the Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body of the Roslin Institute, and the infection study was approved by the Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body of the Moredun Research Institute. All experiments involving animals were authorized by the UK Home Office and were performed in accordance with the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.