Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Alvarez-Silberberg, Valentina Ignacia
Alvarez-Silberberg, Camila Paz
Galletti, Cosimo
Flores-Fraile, Javier
Galletti, Cosimo
Ramirez, Valeria
Palma, Cristian Bravo
Gil-Manich, Victor
Fiorillo, Luca
Mehta, Vini
Fernández-Figueras, Maria-Teresa
Cuevas-Nunez, Maria
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 7 January 2026
Accepted: 20 February 2026
First Online: 27 February 2026
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Studies (CEIC) of the Quirón Salud–Catalonia Hospital Group (reference: 202440-APA-HUGC). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. As this study used anonymized retrospective histopathological descriptions without direct patient contact or identifiable information, the requirement for informed consent to participate was waived by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Studies (CEIC) of the Quirón Salud–Catalonia Hospital Group.”
: Comparing AI LLMs models such as ChatGPT, Meta and Gemini, offers a broader point of view of each of their unique capabilities and possible applications in clinical oral pathology settings, with differences in information processing efficiency, data handling and user adaptability.
