Bergmann, Jonas https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9881-7893
Azzi, Tiago https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9314-1067
Neeleman, Rutger https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3824-8727
Monschau, Kianush https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3368-2457
Yazan, Berke https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2610-9354
Jalsovec, Elena https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7315-5494
Westerbeek, Emily https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6664-8833
Weijdema, Felix https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-1102
de Bruin, Jonathan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4297-0502
Fang, Qixiang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2689-6653
van de Schoot, Rens https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-2091
Funding for this research was provided by:
Innovative Health Initative Joint Undertaking (101132847)
Article History
Received: 8 December 2025
Accepted: 18 March 2026
First Online: 22 March 2026
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: The Screenathon 2.0 protocol and data collection for the investigation were accepted by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences of Utrecht University on 20 May 2025 (file no. 25–0241). All participants provided informed consent prior to participating in the study. We confirm that all experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
: Not applicable.
: Large language models were not used to generate text for the present paper. They were, however, utilized during editing to correct grammar mistakes and improve the writing style. Furthermore, they were used to help write R code to create figures. After using these tools, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.