Crossmark

Comparative assessment of five analytical methods for airborne microplastics highlights importance of identifying sub-$$10~\upmu \hbox {m}$$ methods

Published Online: 2026-05-17

Authors

Aves, Alex

MacDonald, Anna

Naeher, Sebastian

Materić, Dušan

Castle, Deonie

Davy, Perry

Gaw, Sally

Revell, Laura E.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Royal Society Te Apārangi (21-UOC-003-CSG)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-05-17

Version of Record valid from 2026-07-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 28 September 2025

Accepted: 14 April 2026

First Online: 17 May 2026

Declarations

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current