Updates are available Correction dated 2015-12-02
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16135
-
Authors
Letourneau, Audrey
Santoni, Federico A.
Bonilla, Ximena
Sailani, M. Reza
Gonzalez, David
Kind, Jop
Chevalier, Claire
Thurman, Robert
Sandstrom, Richard S.
Hibaoui, Youssef
Garieri, Marco
Popadin, Konstantin
Falconnet, Emilie
Gagnebin, Maryline
Gehrig, Corinne
Vannier, Anne
Guipponi, Michel
Farinelli, Laurent
Robyr, Daniel
Migliavacca, Eugenia
Borel, Christelle
Deutsch, Samuel
Feki, Anis
Stamatoyannopoulos, John A.
Herault, Yann
van Steensel, Bas
Guigo, Roderic
Antonarakis, Stylianos E.
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 26 September 2013
Accepted: 4 March 2014
First Online: 16 April 2014
Change Date: 2 December 2015
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: Nature 508, 345–350 (2014); doi:10.1038/nature13200 Owing to a labelling error in the input files, one of the two replicate data sets used for Fig. 5d and e and Supplementary Fig. 6d of this Article was incorrect. We have now repeated the analysis with a correct, independent replicate experiment. This confirms our previous conclusion that there are no detectable differences in nuclear lamina interactions between the normal and trisomy 21 twin cells.
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
