Updates are available Correction dated 2023-03-02
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-023-00455-5
-
Authors
Rademaker, Gilles
Costanza, Brunella
Bellier, Justine
Herfs, Michael
Peiffer, Raphaël
Agirman, Ferman
Maloujahmoum, Naïma
Habraken, Yvette
Delvenne, Philippe
Bellahcène, Akeila
Castronovo, Vincent http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-6272
Peulen, Olivier http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-0134
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 6 February 2019
Accepted: 18 February 2019
First Online: 8 March 2019
Change Date: 2 March 2023
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-023-00455-5
Conflict of interest
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: All human sections were used with the agreement of the Human Ethic Committee of the University of Liège and from the University Hospital (approval #2014–103). According to Belgian law, patients were informed that the residual surgical material could be used for research purpose and the consent is presumed as long as the patient does not oppose.
