Kim, Junsik
Lee, Bum Suk
Lee, Hye-Jin
Kim, Hye-Ri
Cho, Duk-Youn
Lim, Jung-Eun
Kim, Jin-Ju
Kim, Ha Yeon
Han, Zee-A http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8070-2218
Funding for this research was provided by:
This study was supported by a grant (NRCTR-IN15001) of the Translational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, Korea National Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea.
Article History
Received: 21 March 2018
Revised: 10 July 2018
Accepted: 23 July 2018
First Online: 11 September 2018
Change Date: 4 February 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the original version of the article the authors incorrectly stated that: “One case study provided evidence of some improvements in motor performance and spasticity [19], while several other studies only provided evidence on the feasibility of UER as an assessment tool; however, the fact that the manufacturer funded these studies lessens their objectivity [15, 20–24].” This is not correct as the manufacturers did not fund the studies. The correct phrase therefore should have read: “One case study provided evidence of some improvements in motor performance and spasticity [19], while several other studies provided evidence focusing more on the feasibility of UER rather than the clinical efficacy [15, 20–24].” The authors would like to apologise for this error.This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research.
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.