Crossmark

Articaine in dentistry: an overview of the evidence and meta-analysis of the latest randomised controlled trials on articaine safety and efficacy compared to lidocaine for routine dental treatment

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00082-5

Published Online: 2021-07-17

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Martin, Erica http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1245-8214
Nimmo, Alan

Lee, Andrew

Jennings, Ernest
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-07-17

Version of Record valid from 2021-07-17
More Information

Article History

Received: 27 March 2021

Revised: 11 June 2021

Accepted: 29 June 2021

First Online: 17 July 2021

Change Date: 11 August 2021

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:

Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00085-2

Competing interests

: The authors declare no competing interests.

: The James Cook University Human Research Ethics Committee abides in accordance with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007 updated in 2018). The National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research allows certain human research to be exempted from ethical review, it is a negligible risk research and involves only the use of existing collections of data or records that contain only non-identifiable data about human beings (Section 5.1.22-23).

Updates are available Correction dated 2021-08-11

Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-021-00085-2