Saproo, Sheetanshu http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2221-1840
Sarkar, Shashanka S. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1639-2371
Gupta, Ekta http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7872-3194
Chattopadhyay, Sourav http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-0793
Charaya, Aarzoo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-4671
Kalra, Siddhant http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2800-4559
Ahuja, Gaurav http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-9361
Naidu, Srivatsava http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1441-2749
Funding for this research was provided by:
IIT Ropar - Early career grant to Dr. Srivatsava Naidu
Article History
Received: 26 April 2022
Revised: 28 September 2022
Accepted: 4 October 2022
First Online: 17 October 2022
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: Mice work protocols were approved (IISERM/SAFE/PRT/2020/005) by the institutional animal ethics committee, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, as per the standards of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), and comply with the ARRIVE guidelines. Frozen specimens of LUAD or NAT were obtained from Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre (RGCI&RC), New Delhi, India, in accordance with the guidelines of the institutional review board (Approval number: RGCIRC/IRB/343/2019) and the Declaration of Helsinki.