Vuong, Quan-Hoang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0790-1576
Duong, Minh-Phuong Thi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2487-9905
Sari, Ni Putu Wulan Purnama https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8869-9607
La, Viet-Phuong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4301-9292
Nguyen, Minh-Hoang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7520-3844
Article History
Received: 19 December 2023
Accepted: 30 October 2024
First Online: 9 November 2024
Competing interests
: Quan-Hoang Vuong and Minh-Hoang Nguyen were members of the Editorial Board of this journal at the time of acceptance for publication. The manuscript was assessed in line with the journal’s standard editorial processes, including its policy on competing interests.
: Ethical approval is exempted from this kind of study for several reasons. Specifically, our institutes do not mandate ethical approval for social survey research. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, formal ethical review boards for conservation research practices were unavailable in Vietnam during survey collection (between June 18 and August 8, 2021) due to the lack of expertise and resources (Brittain et al. ).
: To uphold the ethical standard of the study’s design, we instructed the participants to read and agree with the consent form, which stipulates the research purposes, questionnaire contents, and participants' confidentiality prior to undertaking the survey. Only when the participants agreed with the consent form did the survey continue. Moreover, while filling in the questionnaire on Google Forms, the participants could stop at any time, and all of their personal data and responses were not recorded unless they submitted the questionnaire. Since this study was not funded, we are not constrained by contractual obligations and can prioritize safeguarding the participants’ information without compromise.