Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Pepin, Kim M.
Carlisle, Keith
Chipman, Richard B.
Cole, Dana
Anderson, Dean P.
Baker, Michael G. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1865-1536
Benschop, Jackie
Bunce, Michael
Binny, Rachelle N.
French, Nigel
Greenhalgh, Suzie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-5059
O’Neale, Dion RJ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3827-3480
McDougall, Scott https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-0532
Morgan, Fraser J. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-3361
Muellner, Petra
Murphy, Emil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-8382
Plank, Michael J. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-3465
Tompkins, Daniel M.
Hayman, David TS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-3015
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 12 February 2024
Accepted: 20 May 2025
First Online: 21 June 2025
Competing interests
: The authors declare no competing interests. None of the authors are on the editorial board of Humanities and Social Science Communications.
: Our study protocol was submitted to the Sterling Institutional Review Board (number: 10792) and determined to be exempt on March 6, 2023 due to its low risk for negative impacts to participants, based on the terms of the US Department of Health and Human Service’s (DHHS) Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects at 45 C.F.R. §46.104(d)—following a Category 2 exemption.
: Prior to conducting the interviews (prior to April 20, 2023) each interviewee received a written participant information sheet to review, which described the purpose, objectives, participant roles, and methods of the study, and a written informed consent form that participants signed to acknowledge their understanding of the objectives and expectations of the interview, plans for treatment of the data and reporting of results. Participants were asked if they would like to review a written transcript after the interview and whether they would like to remain anonymous.
