Benathar, T. C. M.
Nagamachi, C. Y.
Rodrigues, L. R. R.
O’Brien, P. C. M.
Ferguson-Smith, M. A.
Yang, F.
Pieczarka, J. C. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2951-8877
Funding for this research was provided by:
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (552032/2010-7, 308401/2013-1, 308428/2013-7)
Fundação Amazônia Paraense de Amparo à Pesquisa (ICAAF 007/2011, ICAAF 064/2011)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Edital Pró-Amazônia)
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (2.318.697.0001)
Article History
Received: 21 October 2018
Accepted: 11 April 2019
First Online: 7 May 2019
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The specimens were captured with mist nets and kept stress-free with full access to food and water until their necessary euthanasia was performed in accordance with animal welfare guidelines established by Resolution 1000/2012 from the Brazilian Federal Council of Veterinary Medicine, as dscribed in the Methods section. The Ethics Committee (Comitê de Ética Animal da Universidade Federal do Pará) approved this research (Permit 68/2015). JCP has a permanent field permit, number 13248 from “Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade”. The Cytogenetics Laboratory from UFPa has a special permit number 19/2003 from the Ministry of Environment for samples transport and 52/2003 for using the samples for research.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.