Baumgart, Mario
Barth, Emanuel http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8858
Savino, Aurora
Groth, Marco
Koch, Philipp
Petzold, Andreas
Arisi, Ivan
Platzer, Matthias
Marz, Manja
Cellerino, Alessandro
Funding for this research was provided by:
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur (RegenerAging - FSU-I-03/14, JenAge; BMBF support code: 0315581)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BA 5576/1-1)
Scuola Normale Superiore
Article History
Received: 28 December 2016
Accepted: 20 July 2017
First Online: 5 September 2017
Change Date: 27 November 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported that the images of Figs. 1, 2 and 3 were published in the incorrect order, whereby they mismatch with their captions.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The protocols of animal maintenance and experiments were approved by the local authority in the State of Thuringia (Veterinaer-und Lebensmittelueberwachungsamt) complying with the EU directive 2010/63 and the german Animal Welfare Act §4(3) on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.Animals were bred and maintained for generations in-house in the institute’s fish facility (Leibniz-Institute on Aging - Fritz-Lipmann-institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745 Jena, German) under animal husbandry license J-SHK-2684-04-08/11.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.