Crossmark

Motifome comparison between modern human, Neanderthal and Denisovan

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4710-1

Published Online: 2018-06-18

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Cserhati, Matyas F. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3905-6303
Mooter, Mary-Ellen

Peterson, Lauren

Wicks, Benjamin

Xiao, Peng

Pauley, Mark

Guda, Chittibabu
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Nebraska INBRE (2P20GM103427)

Nebraska Research Initiative, UNMC

CCSG award (5P30CA036727)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-06-18
More Information

Article History

Received: 20 November 2017

Accepted: 22 April 2018

First Online: 18 June 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: No human or animal subjects were used during this study.

: The corresponding author hereby declares that the authors have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.